I just found an article by Zadie Smith on E.M. Forster. It was pointed out in the community
british_fiction I copied it and intended to read it later, but the first paragraph caught my eye. I haven't read on, because I don't have the time right now, but I like what she says in this first two paragraphs, and the way she says it.
All in all, I like this way more than what I read in THIS article, written in 1974 by Andrew Hodges and David Hutter, which I find rather ridiculous in thinking that Forster could have actually brought on homosexual law reform by outing himself, and agressively attacks him.
So much today, on E.M. Forster.
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
All in all, I like this way more than what I read in THIS article, written in 1974 by Andrew Hodges and David Hutter, which I find rather ridiculous in thinking that Forster could have actually brought on homosexual law reform by outing himself, and agressively attacks him.
So much today, on E.M. Forster.
Tags: